This article explores the relationship between gender diversity on corporate boards and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) performance. CSR, defined as the commitment of businesses to contribute to sustainable economic, social, and environmental practices, has gained significant attention in the corporate world. Key dimensions of CSR, including environmental responsibility, social equity, and corporate governance, are central to this discussion. The article establishes the link between corporate governance structures and CSR, with a particular focus on the role of gender diversity on boards. Drawing on various theoretical frameworks, including the upper echelons theory, resource dependence theory, and agency theory, the paper examines how gender diversity influences CSR decision-making and performance. A review of empirical studies highlights mixed findings, with some studies showing a positive impact of female board representation on CSR, while others indicate a neutral or negative relationship. This paper is theoretical and contributes to the growing body of literature by providing updated insights into the strategic role of gender diversity in corporate governance and sustainability. The findings offer valuable implications for both academics and practitioners, suggesting that increasing gender diversity on boards may contribute to more robust CSR practices, though the impact may vary depending on contextual factors.
Zaid, M., Wang, M., Adib, M., Sahyouni, A., & T. F. Abuhijleh, S. (2020). Boardroom nationality and gender diversity : Implications for corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291-309.
Adams, R. B., Gray, S., & Nowland, J. (2011). Does gender matter in the boardroom? Evidence from the market reaction to mandatory new director announcements. Evidence from the Market Reaction to Mandatory New Director Announcements (November 2, 2011).
Al Fadli, A., Sands, J., Jones, G., Beattie, C., & Pensiero, D. (2019). Board gender diversity and CSR reporting: Evidence from Jordan. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 13(3), 29-52.
Ali, M., Grabarski, M. K., Ahmed, S., & Imtiaz, N. (2024). Does leadership gender diversity drive corporate social responsibility and organizational outcomes? The role of organization size. Australian Journal of Management, 49(3), 319-339.
Allouche, J., Huault, I., & Schmidt, G. (2004). Responsabilité sociale des entreprises : la mesure détournée. XVème Congrès de l’AGRH, 2390-410.
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448.
Baysinger, B. D., & Butler, H. N. (2019). Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. In Corporate Governance (pp. 215-238). Gower.
Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12), 4699.
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of business ethics, 113(2), 185-197.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibility of the Businessman. New York: Harper and Row.
Bruna, M. G., Đặng, R., Ammari, A., & Houanti, L. (2021). The effect of board gender diversity on
corporate social performance : An instrumental variable quantile regression approach. Finance
Research Letters, 40, 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101734
Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428-442.
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
Capelle-Blancard, G. (2013). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise : Enjeux, stratégies, impacts (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, The Netherlands).
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society, 38(3), 268-295.
Chang, Y., Wu, K. T., Lin, S. H., & Lin, C. J. (2024). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1), 7.
Charan, R. (1998). How boards make good CEOs better. Leader to Leader, 1998(8), 47‑53.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ltl.40619980812
Chiao, Y. C., Chang, Y. C., Hsu, Y. J., Lu, C. H., & Chang, M. L. (2024). Gender diversity in top management team and corporate social responsibility performance: examining the moderating nature of TMT international experience. Gender in Management: An International Journal.
Činčalová, S., & Hedija, V. (2020). Firm characteristics and corporate social responsibility: The case of Czech transportation and storage industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 1992. https://doi. org/10.3390/su12051992
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1-13.
Dardour, A., Toumi, N. B. F., & Boussaadaa, R. (2018). Composition du conseil d’administration et
divulgation d’informations RSE. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, NS-4.
https://doi.org/10.4000/fcs.2674
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76.
Drucker, P. F. (1984). Converting social problems into business opportunities: The new meaning of corporate social responsibility. California Management Review (pre-1986), 26(000002), 53.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. The developmental social psychology of gender, 12(174), 9781410605245-12.
Eccles, R. G., Lee, L. E., & Stroehle, J. C. (2020). The social origins of ESG: An analysis of Innovest and KLD. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 575-596.
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California management review, 36(2), 90-100.
Elkington, J. (2013). Enter the triple bottom line. In The triple bottom line (pp. 1-16). Routledge.
Epstein, E. M. (1987). The corporate social policy process: Beyond business ethics, corporate social responsibility, and corporate social responsiveness. California management review, 29(3), 99-114.
Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California management review, 2(4), 54-61.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. (Boston : Pitman Publishing Inc.)
Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1962). Capitalism and freedom.[By] M. Friedman, with the assistance of Rose D. Friedman. University of Chicago Press.
Gebba, T. R. (2015). Corporate governance mechanisms adopted by UAE national commercial banks. Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 5(5), 23.
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard university press.
Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance :
Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463‑479.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons : The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top
Managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193‑206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Heald, M. (2018). The social responsibilities of business: Company and community, 1900-1960. Routledge.
Hopkins, M. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Issues Paper.
Huse, M., & Grethe Solberg, A. (2006). Gender‐related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in management review, 21(2), 113-130.
Issa, A., & Zaid, M. A. A. (2021). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate environmental
performance : A multi-theoretical perspective in the MENA region. International Journal of
Accounting & Information Management, 29(4), 603‑630. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-
2021-0101
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review.
Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106, 53-72.
Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California management review, 22(3), 59-67.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life : Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses
to Token Women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965‑990.
https://doi.org/10.1086/226425
Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2002). Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.230
Kyaw, K., Olugbode, M., & Petracci, B. (2017). Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance?. Corporate Governance : The international journal of business in society, 17(5), 789-802.
Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2009). Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: An integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of business ethics, 87, 71-89.
McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society (Vol. 45097). SAGE Publications.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
Oh, W.-Y., Chang, Y. K., & Jung, R. (2019). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility :
Does family involvement in management matter? Journal of Business Research, 103, 23‑33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.028
Passas, I. (2024). The Evolution of ESG: From CSR to ESG 2.0. Encyclopedia, 4(4), 1711-1720.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2015). External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 355-370). Routledge.
Setó‐Pamies, D. (2015). The Relationship between Women Directors and Corporate Social
Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6),
334‑345. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1349
Smith, D., & Rhiney, E. (2020). CSR commitments, perceptions of hypocrisy, and recovery. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5, 1-12.
Tuzzolino, F., & Armandi, B. R. (1981). A need-hierarchy framework for assessing corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 6(1), 21-28.
Yarram, S. R., & Adapa, S. (2021). Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility : Is there
a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123319.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123319
15 April 2025
Indie folks start out by making something they want to read, that tell stories they want told..