Philosophical Warnings on the Use of AI in Education Timely Advice from Plato, Martin Heidegger, Zhuangzi, and C. S. Lewis


The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human and Social Studies, Vol.3, issue 2, p.28-38, 2024
1 Downloads, 8 views
  • Research paper

Abstract

Some important warnings about how we use technology in the philosophies of Plato, Martin Heidegger, Zhuangzi, and C. S. Lewis are relevant to the use of AI in education. Plato cautions us concerning what is lost when we let technology replace some of our own thinking processes. Far from making us more intelligent, the use of AI in writing falls into the mistakes Plato warns us against: We get lazy with learning and remembering, and we substitute a bundle of information for the wisdom and comprehension that constitute genuine knowledge. Heidegger advises against using technology to create more of a product and reducing the role of humanity to merely a part of the system of production. When writing with AI, we abandon our responsibility to shepherd our own work, and we become tools in the machinery of creating a written product, even letting the software guide us rather than the other way around. Zhuangzi teaches us not to follow the patterns set by social convention. Material written by AI is a distillation of conventional word-patterns. Lewis warns us that we abolish part of humanity when we use technology to get what we want without first learning to love what is good. Using AI to get our writing done means sacrificing the essential human love for finding and understanding the truth, instead allowing our own words to be conditioned by unknown authors of algorithms. In this article I explain these matters and close with some helpful suggestions for how we might use AI more constructively—assuming we are going to use it at all.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, education, Plato, C. S. Lewis, Martin Heidegger, Zhuangzi, philosophy of education

References

Boethius. (n.d.). The Consolation of Philosophy. Penguin Classics.

Boone, M. J. (2016). Introduction: Finding C. S. Lewis in science fiction film and television. In K. C. Neece & M. J. Boone (Eds.), Science fiction film and the abolition of man: Finding C. S. Lewis in science fiction films and television (pp. 1–21). Pickwick Publications.

Coblentz, T. (2016). A vision of transcendence: Monstrous intelligence and loving understanding. In M. J. Boone & K. C. Neece (Eds.), Science fiction and the abolition of man: Finding C. S. Lewis in science fiction films and television (pp. 104–120). Pickwick Publications.

Coutinho, S. (n.d.). Zhuangzi (Chuang-Tzu, 369—298 B.C.E.). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/zhuangzi-chuang-tzu-chinese-philosopher/

Frakes, J. (Director). (1999). Star Trek: Insurrection. Paramount.

Heidegger, M. (1977). Letter on humanism. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings (pp. 217–265). Harper & Row.

Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings (pp. 311–341). Harper & Row.

Kipling, R. (n.d.). If. Retrieved from: https://poets.org/poem/if

Laozi. (1991). Daodejing (A. C. Muller, Trans.). http://www.acmuller.net/con-dao/daodejing.html

Lewis, C. S. (1947). The abolition of man. Macmillan.

Plato. (1997). Phaedrus (A. Nehamas & P. Woodruff, Trans.). In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works. Hackett.

Watson, B. (2003). Introduction to Zhuangzi: Basic writings. In B. Watson (Trans.), Zhuangzi: Basic writings (pp. vii–xv). Columbia University Press.

Zhuangzi. (2003). Zhuangzi: Basic writings (B. Watson, Trans.). Columbia University Press.

 


Publication date:

6 November 2024

Subscribe for latest updates

Indie folks start out by making something they want to read, that tell stories they want told..