Abstract
Over the past few decades, all components of the public administration have undergone transformations that have led to a reevaluation of several ideas. The main change revolves around increasingly open and flexible boundaries due to the proliferation of actors and partners, necessitating changes in operating methods that are becoming more decentralized and horizontal. This dynamic process is often challenging to grasp, particularly for the national system of scientific research and innovation. In this perspective, stakeholders engage in cross-cutting relationships that impact each other within this system, interact, and exert varying degrees of influence, notably through cooperation where each partner seeks to promote the approach that best aligns with their needs. These partners encompass all categories that can support and strengthen the system, providing technical and financial support, among other forms. This necessitates that the system and its components consider, in a broader sense, the expectations and needs of its environment, beyond the simple pursuit of efficiency prescribed by the New Public Management (NPM) paradigm. Hence, the relevance of stakeholder theory in conjunction with the systemic approach within the framework of this study.
Keywords
Public Governance, Stakeholders, Systemic Approach, New Public Management, Cooperation
References
- Barre, R., & al. (2007). Management de la recherche: enjeux et perspectives. De Boeck.
- Boston, J. (2011). Basic NPM ideas and their development. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management (Farnham: Ashgate).
- Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a Stakeholder approach. Pitman.
- Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
- Gaillard, A.M., & Gaillard, J. (2001). Les enjeux des migrations scientifiques internationales: De la quête du savoir à la circulation des compétences. Revue Tiers Monde, 707-709.
- Gaillard, J. (1999). La coopération scientifique et technique avec les pays du Sud: Peut-on partager la science? Edition KARTHALA.
- Gaillard, J. (2003). Overcoming the Scientific Generation Gap in Africa: An Urgent Priority. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 15-25.
- Giz Gmbh. (2015). La gestion des coopérations dans la pratique. Springer Gabler.
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
- Huteau, S. (2006). Le management public territorial. Editions du Papyrus.
- Juignet, P. (2015). Le psychisme humain. hal-03180176v2.
- Le Gallou, F., & Bouchon-Menier, B. (1992). Systémique, Théorie et applications. Gesta.
- Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1999). Safari en pays stratégie. Village Mondial.
- Mitchell, R.K. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the Principle of Who or What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review.
- Navarro-Flores, O. (2009). Le partenariat en coopération internationale: Paradoxe ou Compromis? Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Peters, B.G., & Pierre, J. (2004). The Quest for Control: Politicization of the Civil Service. Routledge.
- PEttigrew, A. (1997). Le new public management conduit à un nouveau modèle hybride public-privé. Revue française de gestion, 115, 113-120.
- Proulx, D. (2006). Management des organisations publiques: théorie et applications. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Kast et Rosenzweig. (1985). L’organisation comme un système ouvert, c’est-à-dire en relation dynamique avec son environnement.
- UNESCO. (2012). Les réformes des systèmes de gouvernance dans l’enseignement supérieur au Maroc.
Publication date:
30 August 2022
